Scheduling
My work in scheduling concerns optimality conditions, optimal policy
structure (in particular, turnpike structure), and bounds on various
performance measures. Some recent papers appear below.
- J.R. Birge and M.A.H. Dempster, "Optimal Match-Up Strategies in
Stochastic Scheduling", Discrete Applied Mathematics 57 (1995) 105-120.
Abstract
Practical scheduling problems require the consideration of random
events that may
affect planned starting and completion times. In general, these problems
are
quite difficult to analyze. In a previous paper, general conditions were,
however, developed for turnpike optimal strategies and the asymptotic
optimality of strategies that match up with a turnpike strategy. In this
paper, we present examples of these models, comparisons with deterministic
approaches, and discuss implications for practical scheduling.
- M.J. Maddox and J.R. Birge, "Bounds on the Distribution of Tardiness
in PERT Networks," Technical Report, Department of Industrial and
Operations Engineering, University of Michigan.
Abstract
Project activity durations are most often random. Frequently, fixed
penalties
occur when the project exceeds the deadline and other post-deadline
dates. The
costs are due to contractual clauses or fixed costs of expedition. We
consider fixed tardiness costs incurred if a project is more than
$\alpha$
time units tardy. The expected cost of this delay is the fixed cost times
the
probability the project tardiness is greater than $\alpha$. Our interest
is, therefore, in calculating this probability of $\alpha$ time
units of delay. Because the project completion time is the maximum of a
number
of possibly dependent random variables, exactly calculating this
probability is
difficult. The problem is further complicated because there is often
only incomplete information on the distributions of the random activity
durations.
- J.R. Birge and M.A.H. Dempster, "
Stochastic
Programming Approaches to Stochastic
Scheduling," Technical Report 95-12, Department of Industrial and
Operations Engineering, University
of Michigan.
Abstract
Scheduling problems typically require decisions without full
information about the outcomes of those decisions. Yields, resource
availability, performance, demand, costs, and revenues may all vary.
Incorporating these quantities into stochastic scheduling models often
produces
difficulties in analysis that may be addressed in a variety of ways. In
this
paper, we present results based on stochastic programming approaches to the
hierarchy of decisions in typical stochastic scheduling situations. Our
unifying
framework allows us to treat all aspects of a decision in a similar
framework.
We show how views from different levels enable approximations that can
overcome
nonconvexities and duality gaps that appear in deterministic
formulations. In
particular, we show that the stochastic program structure leads to a
vanishing
Lagrangian duality gap in stochastic integer programs as the number of
scenarios increases.
- M.J. Maddox and J.R. Birge, "Using
Second Moment Information in Stochastic Scheduling," Technical Report
TR 96-1, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University
of Michigan, December 1995. (postscript)
- J.R. Birge and K.D. Glazebrook, "Bounds on
Optimal Values in Stochastic Scheduling," Technical Report TR 96-2,
Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of
Michigan, February 1996, revised January 1997. (pdf)
This page is under construction. It was last modified on 4jan01. Send
questions to jrbirge@northwestern.edu.