Options
Work here considers various methods for bounding and approximating complex contingent claim values. Some recent papers follow.
- J. R. Birge, " Quasi-Monte Carlo Approaches to Option Pricing," Technical Report 94-19, Department of Industrial and Operations Engineering, University of Michigan, 1994 (Revised June 1995). (This ps file does not contain the figures. They separately given as the following gif giles: Fig. 1,
Fig. 2,
Fig. 3,
Fig. 4,
Fig. 5,
Fig. 6,
Fig. 7,
Fig. 8,
Fig. 9,
Fig. 10,
Fig. 11,
Fig. 12,
Fig. 13.)
Abstract
Complications such as varying interest rates and complex contingencies
can prohibit analytical computation of option prices. A typical
approach is to rely on Monte Carlo simulation in these cases and to use
statistical properties of assumed random sequences. This approach has
two drawbacks. First, the validity of a pseudo-random sequence for
statistical randomness is somewhat questionable. Second, even assuming
randomness, the error from central limit arguments decreases slowly,
inversely proportional to
the square root of the number of observations. Quasi-Monte Carlo
sequences, on the other hand, do not rely on a randomness assumption
and have order of magnitude better asymptotic error rates. We show how
quasi-Monte Carlo sequences can be used in option pricing, give some
analytical justfication for their preference over crude or pseudo-Monte Carlo
methods, and present some empirical evidence based on simple call option
models.
This page was last modified on 11nov04. Send questions to john.birge at chicagogsb.edu.